返回

关于我们

不是美术馆,专注公共空间推广艺术

用艺术的方式为品牌赋能

“推倒美术馆之墙” 让“艺术”走出“馆”,“不是美术馆”能迅速整合艺术家资源及非职业创作者资源,能够迅速整合全国公共区域资源并因地制宜的策划、实施艺术主题项目。

创始人:刁勇、 唐亮、 杨冰、 于桄

"Oh,not gallery" specializes in the promotional art of public spaces. With slogan as "pulling down the walls of art museums, let the art show in the open","Oh,not gallery"can integrate artists and non-professionals as well as public spaces around the country in an efficient manner, and plan accordingly to launch art programs with specific themes.

前言 文 陈锐

他们把黑板挂在墙上,他们开始讲课。

你不想坐直,也不想举手提问。

他们说,这就是你的不是了。

他们把X光片挂在墙上,他们用目光解剖。

你觉得蛋蛋的疼,退后,站远。

他们说,这就是你的不是了。

他们把神迹挂在墙上,说,啊!仰止。

但,你走神了。

他们说,这就是你的不是了。

他们把大名挂在墙上,说,嗯,大师。

你说,呃,其实我是狮子座。

他们说,这就是你的不是了。

他们用理论砖,砌起审美柱,

他们用风格漆,粉刷主义墙,

他们给这栋墙里的建筑,取个名字:美术馆。

他们让这面墙,

变成一个Be动词:是。

于是,这面自以为“是”的墙,

成了一个句式,

判断句式。

弗朗西斯培根是“现实留下的鬼魂”是“恶狠狠但又无比优雅”是“人性深处腐败龌龊令人绝望的表达”。墙说。

而你只想感叹,培根哥敏感的小心脏是被什么样记忆在扁啊扁啊?好痛好可怜。

墙说。贾科梅蒂是在尝试“在圆的、平静的和尖锐的、激烈的东西之间找到一条解决之道。”

而你只想对儿子说,贾叔叔会捏得泥巴嗷嗷叫,你会吗?

墙说。保罗克利是“下意识里一个网状的庞大根系向下延伸到最深处并引发魔力,

人类记忆的残羹,隐喻多义的象征。”

而你只是起了个念头,如果我是鱼,我该如何画我的四周?

梵高在麦田里被星星击中太阳穴的一瞬间,高更把鼻子埋在塔希提岛的泥土里重建三观的十二年里,根本没想过需要一面墙来为他们造一个判断句。

当你被一枪比星空还灿烂的不知名颜色打中心窝的一瞬间,被一滴沉默的墨水惊醒了你记忆土壤里的某颗冬眠种子时,你也根本不需要一面墙,来说你这也不是那也不是。

于是,

我们推倒了那面墙,

让教条解剖膜拜盲从找不到它们的挂钉,

只为让你感受到这些孩子们莫衷一是的快乐与忧伤恐惧与勇敢异想与脱线懵懂与诗意,没有是与不是。

于是,

我们等待在墙外,

收集你所有自言自省自在自我的表达,

只为让更多人感受到更多人是是而非的梦想与热爱纠结与领悟狂喜与悲怆思念与遗忘,没有是与不是。

这里没有墙,

只有美与你,

这里不是美术馆,

这里没有你的不是。

OH! NOT GALLERY

ITS NOT WHAT YOUR THINKING

They use philosophy as mortars and bricks, to built marvelous columns and pillars.

They use style for lacquer, to pain the concept wall.

They came up with a proper name for the contents within this wall, its called art gallery.

They change this wall to a be-verb,“IS”

Then, this“IS”wall becomes a syntactical structure, a judgment sentence.

Francis bacon was a reality ghost, he was the most ferocious elegant man, the most corrupted rotten being representation in humanity, the wall said. BUT you can only express, bacon, your sensitive heart, what is destroying you over and over again? Painful, sadness.

The wall says, giacometti, was“experimenting a resolution between smooth, peaceful, sharp and extreme objects”. BUT you would like to tell your son, gia-uncle can pinch clays so it screams, can you?

The wall says, paul klee was “a representation of an immense root that stretches deep within human memories, a metaphor”. BUT you only had an epiphany, if you were a fish, how would you paint your surroundings?

Van gogh, when he was struck by the stars in the wheat field, he then stuck his noise in tahiti sands 20 years, never realized the need of a wall for syntactical structure.

When you are struck by a flash move for the moment, when you are awaken by a drop of ink, you do need a wall to tell right and wrong.

Then, we break down the wall, break the cults with religion, so it cannot find its proper pins, only to allow the feelings from the children whom cannot judge happy, emotions, fears and bravery, imaginations, understandings and romantic, etc, no is or not is.

Then, we waited outside the wall, to collect thoughts, freedom, and self ego, only to allow more audience to connect with others, believes, dreams and loves, intertwine, comprehend, happiness and sadness, miss and forget, no is or not is.

There is no wall here,

Only Art and you,

This is not An art gallery,

And there is no“not what your thinking”here.